Thanks for your feedback @bearfacedcow
I’ve certainly thought about it for a while, and I totally understand the approach.
I’d be lying if I said I hadn’t tried using FL Studio to experiment with the suggested chord progressions, play around with the random elements, and use Instacomposer 3 for a MIDI arrangement across a total of six tracks.
don’t know how Frank Zappa would fit into this era, but given his avant-garde nature, we might have been treated to a “Black Page” revealing what kind of synth he would have used.
Anyway, I’m focusing more on musically freeing myself on my Roland through fleeting improvisations (even though I’m still a guitarist), but I’ll still try to be a little less resistant to certain utilities.
Anyway, have a good evening (here) or a good day.
PascalH.
1 Like
Generative AI (I would drop the I and stick to A for artificial) is based on millions of human productions (text, music,images, etc), humans robbed of their intellectual property, with the help of slaves to monitor the learning. It attempts to hide the human aspect behind like the 17e century Mechanical Turk hid a human being.
If it helps producing formatted music for contracts, well, so be it. But if you’re really looking for a creative expression of yourself, it’s not the way to go. Without the huge data and the supervised learning, A creates nothing.
LLM (gpt like) have already destroyed the Internet.
I love how people use the word “generative“ as if it’s a thing. All AI generates something.
AI is not the problem here. It’s the people who are using it at the moment. However, it’s not anything that bothers me because I have seen this trend happen with almost every Tech revolution for the past 40+ years. It passes.
Jord
"Although generative AI offers innovative tools for creating new data and simulations, nongenerative AI excels in analyzing existing data to inform patient care. "
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749806324010181
" Three Types Of AI That Aren’t Generative—And Why They Matter"