March 28, 2024, 02:29:26 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register
News:

Arturia Forums



Author Topic: Poly aftertouch injustice?  (Read 2024 times)

Patrice

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Karma: 5
Poly aftertouch injustice?
« on: August 31, 2010, 10:01:45 pm »
While using a poly aftertouch keyboard, I noticed that whereas the channel AT produces a smooth variation (on a filter, in my trial), the poly AT produces a rough one, as if some smoothing of the MIDI AT messages was in action in the first case but not in the second.

Also, the poly AT seems to have more impact than the channel AT.

To check this, just assemble an origin oscillator with a half closed LP filter.

Could the channel AT have benefited from a preferential treatment? ;)

slammah2012

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
  • Karma: -2
Re: Poly aftertouch injustice?
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2010, 05:54:11 am »
 >:(
Well, if that is the case, I wont be buying one when the CS80V template is relesed this year....

polyat  works fine on the cs80v software.....if the hardware cant keep up, there is no point....
i will most likely buy a v-machine and run the software in its place......

Patrice

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Karma: 5
Re: Poly aftertouch injustice?
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2010, 07:16:18 pm »
On my opinion, it wasn't intended. It's certainly due to an oversight. Nothing that Arturia can't fix in a future firmware upgrade.

slammah2012

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
  • Karma: -2
Re: Poly aftertouch injustice?
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2011, 08:36:27 am »
Wow..... another Arturia let down shocker........

I notice that they dropped all information about a CS80 Template in update 1.5.....

now all it says is this......

[ Q3 2011 ] 1.5 Version
new features to be confirmed.

Thanks for nothin >:(

 

Carbonate design by Bloc
SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines