September 17, 2021, 02:26:21 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email
News:

Arturia Forums



Author Topic: Vocoder update question  (Read 581 times)

MrMack

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: 0
Vocoder update question
« on: August 27, 2020, 01:25:37 am »
If I want to use the audio input to bring an external signal into the MF not for vocoding, but just for processing through the analog filter, is this possible?

Germain.arturia

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 369
  • Karma: 15
  • arturia test team
Re: Vocoder update question
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2020, 10:04:56 am »
Hello,
unfortunately it is not possible, but have been requested by some users. I agree it could be fun.
Don't know what will be decided in the future.
thanks,

MrMack

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: 0
Re: Vocoder update question
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2020, 03:29:40 pm »
Thanks for the reply.  In looking at the new parameters, that was my conclusion as well.  Something like a balance or wet/dry setting could be added to allow this capability (and would also be beneficial for vocoding).  Should be an easy thing to add in a future update.  Please consider this my request for such a feature.

Thanks again,
MrMack

Aken

  • Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: 0
Re: Vocoder update question
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2020, 09:45:10 am »
Oh god yes, to be honest, that's the first thing I tried to achieve when trying the new vocoder engine. I wished we could just let the raw audio in to the filters and more. This is a no brainer, the value it adds to the unit is insane. You could send a rhythm from another gear and choose to apply effects on it or not, same for the voice. It makes the MF a purely live oriented synth, especially for those making loops. It is a growing trend and would place the MF as the reference synth for that type of practice.

 

Carbonate design by Bloc
SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines